U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Washington, D. C. 20210 |
CLASSIFICATION
WIA Performance |
| CORRESPONDENCE
SYMBOL
OCTA/OWS |
|
| ISSUE
DATE
November 19, 2001 |
|
| RESCISSIONS
None | EXPIRATION
DATE
Continuing |
|
DIRECTIVE |
: |
TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 14-00, Change 1 |
|
TO |
: |
ALL STATE WORKFORCE LIAISONS |
|
FROM |
: |
EMILY STOVER DeROCCO |
|
SUBJECT |
: |
Guidance on the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Management Information and Reporting System |
Purpose. To provide revisions and clarification to technical guidance previously issued to states for reporting participant data required under Title 1B of the Workforce Investment Act.
Additionally, to notify states that in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, OMB has granted a 90 day extension to this reporting packet to allow for the collection of data on the quarterly and annual reports, and the WIASRD. This action extends the reporting packet to January 31, 2002.
References. Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA), section 136; WIA Final Rules, 20 CFR part 666; Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 14-00; OMB Circular No. A-94 Revised, Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs; OMB Notice of Action 1205-0420, September 26, 2001.
Background. In TEGL No. 14-00, the Department issued technical guidance to states for use in reporting participation and outcome information. This change outlines additions and clarifies information given in TEGL 14-00.
Changes to the WIA Standardized Record Data (WIASRD).
Item 114. Recently Separated Veteran
A veteran who applied for participation under WIA Title 1B within 48 months after discharge or release from active U.S. military, naval, or air service.
Note: The WIASRD, Item 114, mistakenly stated veterans must apply within a 12 month period of time. PL 105-220 Subtitle A-Workforce Investment Definitions, Section 101, 49(B) states the correct definition of a recently separated veteran.
Item 308. Displaced Homemaker (Statewide (15%) Activities)
This item is also required for Dislocated Workers who received Core, Intensive and Training services.
Note: After discussion with state and Federal staff, a decision was made that Displaced Homemakers could be considered under Dislocated Workers.
Item 622. Other Reasons for Exit
Reservists called to active duty who choose not to return to WIA. When an entry is made in this item, the individual's outcome is excluded from performance.
Item 627. Attainment of Goal #1
Code 3 = Set, but attainment pending. This code should not be used after exit. When the youth exits, this field should be marked with a "a1" or "2" for all goals that have been set.
Changes to the WIA Quarterly Report.
Clarifications of Required Narrative Portions and Definitions on the WIA Annual Report.
During the Reporting Training offered to state and regional personnel throughout the country, the Performance Team presented a simple, one-page WIA Financial Statement (attachment H) as an example for use when submitting the Annual Report. This financial statement was well received by all state/regional staff and contains two parts discussing the Operating Results and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (COEA). While there are many methods of showing this requirement, Attachment H gives one example of how to prepare a COEA. Though this WIA Financial Statement as shown in Attachment H is not a requirement at this time, it is an excellent way of showing the financial posture of WIA operations in your state and would meet the requirement of the law for this area.
1) the state is conducting a statewide activity that does not involve direct services (e.g., research or evaluation),
2) the activity is structured to provide services that are highly specialized, such as a pilot or demonstration activity for which the state establishes separate, or its own specific, goals not typically addressed in the adult, dislocated worker or youth activities (e.g., the activities support incumbent worker training authorized under Section 134(a)(3)(A)(iv)(I), or a project for chemically dependent TANF recipients).
Changes to Performance Outcome Verification Requirements. States are required to establish basic standard operating procedures for data collection and handling to ensure the quality and integrity of the data over time. At a minimum, states must address "data verification" and "data validation" in the established procedures to ensure that the resulting database and reports are certifiably accurate. Federal Regional Offices have been instructed on procedures for data validation and of their requirement to become thoroughly familiar with data collection efforts states must have in place. Regional staff are prepared to assist states as necessary. At a minimum, states must have standard operating procedures in place for data collection. Performance data submitted on the quarterly and annual reports must be verified and validated at the state level.
"Data verification" involves checking the accuracy of all or a sample of the computerized records against the original paperwork or other source(s). Although the goal of data entry is to achieve 100% correct entries, it is rarely accomplished due to recording or keying errors. The "data verification" process is the verification of the accuracy of all or a sample of keyed entries by their comparison with the original source(s) to identify and correct errors.
"Data validation," on the other hand, involves checking the reasonableness of all or a sample of the data entered into the computerized data base. Although data may be correctly transcribed from the forms, the data may not be accurate or logical because of recording errors. For example, entering a date of exit from WIA-funded services for a participant that is before his or her date of registration raises doubt about the accuracy of such entries, regardless of whether or not they were properly transcribed from the paperwork or forms.
Examples of procedures for data collection and handling to ensure that the resulting database is accurate include:
checking the accuracy of the computerized records against the original source, usually hard copies of records;
performing logical checks of the data (although data may be correctly transcribed from the original forms, the data may not be accurate because of misprints, typographical errors and other mistakes);
random call-backs to participants or contacting other sources to verify the accuracy of information collected; and
having a trained staff member evaluate data collection efforts by randomly observing interviews and other data collection methods.
Action Required. Recipients should distribute this guidance letter to all officials within the state who need such information to report participant data.
Inquiries. Questions concerning this issuance may be directed to the appropriate Regional Office.
Attachments. Revised Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Performance Reporting System Packet consisting of the following: (Attachments A-D not included):
E. WIA Standardized Record Data (WIASRD).
G. Revised Instructions and Form for the WIA Title 1B Annual Report (ETA 9091) (dated October 1, 2001).
H. WIA Financial Statement and Guidance on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (COEA) (dated October 1, 2001).