U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Washington, D. C. 20210 |
CLASSIFICATION
UIS |
| CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
TEUMC | |
| ISSUE
DATE
October 5, 1992 | |
| RESCISSIONS
| EXPIRATION
DATE
|
DIRECTIVE |
: |
UIS INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. 01-93 |
TO |
: |
ALL REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS |
FROM |
: |
MARY ANN WYRSCH |
SUBJECT |
: |
Update of Unemployment Insurance Service (UIS) Tracking System for GAO/DIG Audits and Studies |
Attached for your information is an update on the current status of OIG and GAO studies and audits affecting UI as of June 1, 1992. All audits completed more than two years ago will generally be deleted from the tracking system, except those audits to which a current or projected audit makes reference.
In some instances, there may be reference to developments after June 1, 1992. The summaries were prepared with assistance of the OIG and GAO staff. Future updates will continue to be issued semi-annually.
If you have additional information or questions concerning any of the studies and audits, please contact the tracking coordinator, Barbara A. Campbell, 8-219-5340.
TRACKING SYSTEM FOR THE OIG AND GAO AUDITS
STATUS UPDATE
JUNE 1, 1992
DIG/GAO AUDITS AND STUDIES
|
1-1 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-5 2-1 2-2 3-1 3-2 |
| Study/Report Title: | Federal Employees' Compensation Trust Fund Account (12-90-012-03-315) |
| Subject Area: | Financial Management - Budget |
| Status: | Projected Current X Completed Other |
| Initiating Agency/Office: | OIG X GAO Other |
| Period of Performance (Begin-end Dates): | June 1989 until Completion |
| Study Location: | National Office |
| Purpose of Study (Description/Objectives): | To evaluate the Federal Employees' Compensation account to determine if it is administered in accordance with applicable statutes and regulations. The overall objective of the review is to determine why the cash fund is declining, and to project the future cash needs to insure solvency of the fund. |
| Action Required: | N/A |
| Action Referred to (UI Contact, Office. Telephone): | Wanda Drew, OLAS, Room 5-4522 FPB, 219-9213 |
| ETA Transmittal/Notification Date: | N/A Draft Report Received: February 1990 Final Report Received: May 1990 |
| UI Response Due Date: | July 16, 1990 |
| Status of Response:elow. | See "Comments" Below |
| Comments: | Two of the three recommendations were closed on March 23, 1992. The one remaining recommendation, which was resolved but not closed, had to be re-evaluated upon completion of the field work. The field work has now been completed, however, OIG has not notified UIS of the status of the recommendations. |
| Study/Report Title: | Monitoring of the Quality Control (QC) Program |
| Subject Area: | Quality Control Implementation |
| Status: | Projected Current X Completed Other |
| Initiating Agency/Office: | OIG X GAO Other |
| Period of Performance (Begin-end Dates): | Ongoing |
| Study Location: | District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Region III and National Office |
| Purpose of Study (Description/Objectives): | The presurvey will focus on the implementation of QC. |
| Action Required: | None |
| Action Referred To (UI Contact, Office, Telephone): | Burman Skrable, TEUQ, Room 5-4015 FPB, 219-5220 |
| ETA Transmittal/Notification Date: | N/A Draft Report Received: N/A Final Report Received: N/A |
| UI Response Due Date: | N/A |
| STRONG>Status of Response: | N/A |
| Comments: | OIG plans to determine the status/plans of the UIS-QC Program and provide comments on the proposed plans and time frames. They will also identify areas not being reviewed by UISQC and provide comments regarding their inclusion. Additionally, OIG will also provide technical assistance in the pilot testing of the core Revenue QC Program. |
| Study/Report Title: | Review of UCX/UCFE |
| Subject Area: | |
| Status: | Projected Current X Completed Other |
| Initiating Agency/Office: | OIG X GAO Other |
| Period of Performance (Begin-end Dates): | June 1992 until completion. |
| Study Location: | Washington, D.C. and California, and possibly other SESAs. |
| Purpose of Study (Description/Objectives): | A study to determine if the SESAs are properly utilizing the crossmatch mechanism at the LCCC in processing UCX claims. |
| Action Required: | N/A |
| Action Referred To (UI Contact, Office, Telephone): | Sandi King, OPM, Room C-4514 FPB, 219-5309. |
| ETA Transmittal/Notification Date: | N/A Draft Report Received: N/A Final Report Received: N/A |
| UI Response Due Date: | N/A |
| STRONG>Status of Response: | N/A |
| Comments: | The study/review was scheduled to begin some time in June 1992. OIG has completed their review of the California Employment Development Department and expect to report results soon. |
| Study/Report Title: | UI Program Statistics Statements, Federal Reporting and Validation Project #: 03-P89-008-03-001 |
| Subject Area: | |
| Status: | Projected Current X Completed Other |
| Initiating Agency/Office: | OIG X GAO Other |
| Period of Performance (Begin-end Dates): | N/A |
| Study Location: | National Office, ETA Regional Offices and SESAs. |
| Purpose of Study (Description/Objectives): | UIS uses two reporting systems for program statistics -- the CIS and the regular reporting system. The results of a prior study revealed that UIS does not reconcile these two reporting systems and may be funding SESAs using different data than that used for budgeting purposes. |
| Action Required: | N/A |
| Action Referred To (UI Contact, Office, Telephone): | Ron Wilus, OLAS, Room S-4519 FPB, 219-8640 |
| ETA Transmittal/Notification Date: | 11/18/91Mbr>Draft Report Received: N/A Final Report Received: N/A |
| UI Response Due Date: | N/A |
| STRONG>Status of Response: | N/A |
| Comments: | There has been no activity on this audit. The audit is no longer relevant, because it was based on concerns about differences between UI required reports and CIS. Now, with automated reporting, the CIS tables are being derived from the UI required reports, so the data for the two series are identical. |
| Study/Report Title: | Review of SESA Automation Support Accounts |
| Subject Area: | UI Automation |
| Status: | Projected Current X Completed Other |
| Initiating Agency/Office: | OIG X GAO Other |
| Period of Performance (Begin-end Dates): | See 'Comments' Below |
| Study Location: | Approximately 10-19 States will be selected. |
| Purpose of Study (Description/Objectives): | To determine whether ADP equipment was purchased in accordance with the conditions of the grant, whether ADP equipment was used for purposes related to UI automation, and whether valid resources-on-order were established by the SESAs. |
| Action Required: | N/A |
| Action Referred To (UI Contact, Office, Telephone): | Betty E. Castillo, TEUMC, Room S-4516 FPB, 219-5616 |
| ETA Transmittal/Notification Date: | Draft Report Received: N/A Final Report Received: N/A |
| UI Response Due Date: | N/A |
| STRONG>Status of Response: | N/A |
| Comments: | The OIG has conducted audits and begun the audit process in 4 States. It is expected that they will audit approximately 10-19 States who received awards during the Fiscal Years 1987-1991 time period. |
| Study/Report Title: | Self-Employment Demonstration Project -Evaluation of Washington State (09-91-200-03-315) |
| Subject Area: | Research. |
| Status: | Projected Current Completed Other X |
| Initiating Agency/Office: | OIG X GAO Other |
| Period of Performance (Begin-end Dates): | See "Comments" Below |
| Study Location: | Washington State |
| Purpose of Study (Description/Objectives): | Purpose of Study (Description/Objectives): To determine if the program is feasible as it is currently structured and whether it should be recommended to DOL as a viable program to be considered in the formulation of future employment and training policy. |
| Action Required: | None |
| Action Referred To (UI Contact, Office, Telephone): | Steve Wandner OLAS Room S-4231 FPB 219-4620. |
| ETA Transmittal/Notification Date: | Draft Report Received: 11/08/90 Final Report Received: 04/02/91 |
| UI Response Due Date: | 04/15/91 |
| STRONG>Status of Response: | Completed (See Below). |
| Comments: | The audit is completed and had no formal findings and required no corrective action. The OIG however is awaiting the publication of a UIPL before closing out this audit. The UIPL will present the findings of the Project and will demonstrate that ETA has achieved one of the objectives of this Project. This UIPL will not be published until 1994-- after the completion of the Project evaluation. |
| Study/Report Title: | Study/Report Title: Risk Assessment of UI Systems |
| Subject Area: | SESA Internal Security Program |
| Status: | Projected Current X Completed Other |
| Initiating Agency/Office: | OIG X GAO Other |
| Period of Performance (Begin-end Dates): | INA |
| Study Location: | The Chicago OIG Regional Office has been assigned the lead on this Study - SESAs to be studied are undecided at this time. |
| Purpose of Study (Description/Objectives): | Study to assess how SESA Internal Security Units function, including how they plan and conduct risk analyses and follow-up on identified vulnerabilities in existing internal controls. |
| Action Required: | None at this time. |
| Action Referred To (UI Contact, Office, Telephone): | Betty E. Castillo, TEUMC, Room S-4516 FPB, 219-5616 |
| ETA Transmittal/Notification Date: | N/A Draft Report Received: N/A Final Report Received: N/A |
| UI Response Due Date: | N/A |
| STRONG>Status of Response: | N/A |
| Comments: | This Project, which was formerly entitled "Internal Security Program," is still scheduled but cannot be done before FY '94 or '95. Therefore, this audit will be temporarily deleted from the tracking system until such time a decision is made to conduct the audit. |
| Study/Report Title: | UI Experience Rating Follow-Up |
| Subject Area: | Actuarial |
| Status: | Projected Current X Completed Other |
| Initiating Agency/Office: | OIG X GAO Other |
| Period of Performance (Begin-end Dates): | 09/88 to 04/90 |
| Study Location: | See "Comments" Below. |
| Purpose of Study (Description/Objectives): | This review expanded on earlier audit work and provided information to demonstrate the feasibility of reconciliation. The objective was to evaluate the adequacy of the State' UI Trust Fund accounting system, particularly in regard to the accuracy of experience rating information and Federal reporting. |
| Action Required: | N/A |
| Action Referred To (UI Contact, Office, Telephone): | Ron Wilus, TEURA, Room S-4519 FPB, 219-8640 |
| ETA Transmittal/Notification Date: | Draft Report Received: 09/05/89 Final Report Received: 01/25/90 |
| UI Response Due Date: | 04/25/90 |
| STRONG>Status of Response: | ETA Responded 04/18/90 |
| Comments: | Work has been completed in Maryland, New Jersey, Utah, Delaware, West Virginia and Wisconsin. OIG recommends increased ETA leadership to: (1) improve SESA accounting systems; (2) fully account for experience rating; and (3) improve Federal reporting. |
| Study/Report Title: | Single Audit Coverage of DOL Funds (04-91-006-50-598) |
| Subject Area: | INA |
| Status: | Projected Current Completed X Other |
| Initiating Agency/Office: | OIG X GAO Other |
| Period of Performance (Begin-end Dates): | 11/88 to Completion |
| Study Location: | California, Louisiana, New York, North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin. |
| Purpose of Study (Description/Objectives): | To determine the effectiveness of the Single Audit Act of 1988 as it relates to the Secretary of Labor's needs and responsibilities for accounting for DOL funds provided to the States. In addition, to the six States listed above, OIG also plans to visit a sample of sub-recipients which receive DOL funds from these direct recipients. |
| Action Required: | N/A |
| Action Referred To (UI Contact, Office, Telephone): | INA |
| ETA Transmittal/Notification Date: | 12/29/88 Draft Report Received: 03/91 Draft Report Received: 03/29/91 |
| UI Response Due Date: | N/A |
| STRONG>Status of Response: | N/A |
| Comments: | No response is required from UI. No further action is necessary. |